The compromise that might actually get us a nationwide, publicly-financed insurance plan -- what many are calling a "public option" -- is to make it optional? Well, at least the crazy is flowing the way I'd prefer, for once.
Snark aside, the compromise is to make the public option "optional" at the state level -- states can opt out if they want, presumably through legislative action. Sounds fine to me. The point of a public option is to make it big, and the big blue states -- California, New York, &c -- won't opt out. It'll be (mostly) smaller, hyperconservative states that -- Mississippi, Alabama, Idaho -- are most likely to do so. That's unfortunate, because these are also poor states, with lots of citizens who would benefit from public health insurance -- but at least their legislatures can be crazy on their own, and not derail it for the rest of the country.
This is also one more reason I'd better find a postdoc somewhere outside of Idaho.